Head to head · Moisturizers

La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5 vs Augustinus Bader Rich Cream: what the experts say

Across independent expert reviews, La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5 earns a Guru Score of 86% from 23 experts, and Augustinus Bader Rich Cream earns 65% from 15. On the gurus' verdict La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5 comes out ahead. Here is how the two compare, in the experts' own words.

86% Approved
Guru Score from 23 independent experts
Best for dryBest for sensitiveMid-rangeBalm
Read the full verdict →
65% Mixed
Guru Score from 15 independent experts
Best for dryBest for matureLuxuryCream
Read the full verdict →

Which scores higher with the experts?

La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5 holds a Guru Score of 86%, ahead of Augustinus Bader Rich Cream at 65%. The first draws on 23 independent expert reviews, the second on 15. On the experts' own numbers that puts Cicaplast Baume B5 in Approved territory and Rich Cream in Mixed.

What do the experts say about Cicaplast Baume B5?

La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5 carries a Guru Score of 86% from 23 independent experts. Praised across the board as a genuinely versatile rescue balm, the experts highlight its combination of madecassoside, panthenol, and shea butter for soothing irritated or barrier-compromised skin and aiding wound healing. It works well layered over retinoids, but the gurus are consistent on one point: a thin layer only, since using too much on the face can clog pores and trigger milia or breakouts, meaning those with acne-prone skin should treat it as a spot treatment rather than an all-over moisturiser.

What do the experts say about Rich Cream?

Augustinus Bader Rich Cream carries a Guru Score of 65% from 15 independent experts. This reverse emulsion cream delivers a silky, luxurious texture that many find deeply hydrating and especially effective for mature, dry skin; it contains peptides and proprietary complexes intended to support skin renewal and barrier function. However, the price point divides experts sharply: some swear by long-term results and the texture alone, while others find comparable moisturizers work just as well at a fraction of the cost, and a few question whether the patented ingredients justify the expense. Most agree the formula itself is solid but suggest patch-testing first if you have acne-prone or sensitive skin, and using sparingly since a little goes a long way.

Which should you choose?

On the experts' scores La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5 comes out ahead, 86% to 65%, a gap of 21 points. It has 23 experts behind it against 15 for Augustinus Bader Rich Cream. Cicaplast Baume B5 is most often recommended for dry and sensitive skin, Rich Cream for dry and mature. Both are independently verified on the Guru Index, so either is a sound pick; let the use case and your budget settle it.

Common questions

Which has the higher Guru Score, Cicaplast Baume B5 or Rich Cream?

La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5 does, with a Guru Score of 86% from 23 experts. Augustinus Bader Rich Cream sits at 65% from 15 experts.

How many experts reviewed each product?

La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5 has 23 independent expert reviews on the Guru Index; Augustinus Bader Rich Cream has 15.

Are these scores based on sponsored reviews?

No. Both products are independently verified, so the Guru Score reflects the experts' own verdicts rather than paid placements.

What is each product best for?

Cicaplast Baume B5 is most often recommended for dry and sensitive skin. Rich Cream is most often recommended for dry and mature skin.

Keep comparing: build your own side by side or browse all reviewed products.